There is
an enormous delusion of prophetic interpretation that has taken the Christian
world captive today-it's called "The Final Seven Years of Tribulation." And I
would be surprised if you have never heard this phrase mentioned before. Because
right now, all over the world, in books, magazines, videos, on television,
radio, the internet, from pulpits across the land, and even in comic books,
millions of people are talking about events that they firmly believe will come
about during what they call "the final seven years of tribulation."
You are studying the longest and most
significant time prophecy in the Bible. Given more than 500 years
before the death of Christ, it accurately pinpoints the time of His
sacrifice. And as the only place in the Old Testament that speaks of
a coming "Messiah" by that term, it ranks at the top of all
Messianic prophecies. Yet this prophecy, found in the eighth and
ninth chapters of the book of Daniel, moves beyond the earthly
ministry of Christ to provide a panorama of His present work for us
in the courts of heaven.
The True interpretation of Daniel 9:24-27Daniel 9:24 says,
"Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, . .
."
The word determined is a very interesting word and key to an
understanding of the 70-week prophecy. It means "to cut off" (Strong's #2852).
This is the only time this word is used in the entire Bible. The word determined
is used elsewhere, in fact we'll see it used at the end of this chapter, but it
does not have the same meaning in the Hebrew.
"Seventy weeks are (cut off) upon thy people and upon thy holy
city."
The word upon means "concerning" (Strong's #5921). In other words,
"Seventy weeks are cut off concerning thy people and concerning thy holy
city." From what is this 70-week prophecy cut off? from something longer
than itself. It is cut off from a longer vision that Daniel received in chapter
8.
Daniel 8:1 "In the third year of the reign of king Belshazzar a vision
appeared unto me, even unto me Daniel, after that which appeared unto me at the
first." Daniel had several visions and he wrote them down in his book, but
this vision in chapter 8 is the one which relates specifically to the 70-week
prophecy of Daniel 9.
As we follow on through chapter 8, God gives the vision and then at the end
of verse 14 a "certain saint" says, ". . . Unto two thousand and three
hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed."
We know from other verses in the Bible that when we are dealing with time
prophecy, the principle is a day for a year. How we arrive at this is from a
couple of scriptures in Ezekiel 4:6 and Numbers 14:34. Even those who believe in
the popular interpretation of the 70-week prophecy and the final seven years of
tribulation at the end of time understand this principle as well. In fact, up to
a certain point they have it nearly correct.
From verse 15 of chapter 8 on down through the end of the chapter, Gabriel
begins to explain the vision to Daniel. He explained portions of the vision, but
he says nothing at all about the 2300 days and what that meant.
In verses 26 and 27 Gabriel concludes by saying, "And the vision of the
evening and the morning which was told is true: wherefore shut thou up the
vision; for it shall be for many days. And I Daniel fainted, and was sick
certain days; afterward I rose up, and did the king's business; and I was
astonished at the vision, but none understood it."
None understood what? They understood portions of what was explained, but
they didn't understand the application of the 2300 days, of which the 70 weeks
form a part.
Now, let's go back to Daniel 9 and start again with verse 24. Seventy
weeks are determined . . ."
If we apply the day for a year principle, how many days would 70 weeks be? 70
x 7 = 490 years.
490 years "are determined (cut off) upon (concerning) thy
people and (concerning) thy holy city, to finish the transgression, . .
."
God gave Israel a certain portion of time to stop their rebellion against
Him. That's what transgression means.
". . . and to make an end of sins, . . ."
The word sins here is a little more mild of a word than transgression.
It means "to miss the mark." The word sins in the Old Testament can be
used two different ways-sins or sin offerings. It really doesn't matter which
one is used here, because in the Old Testament, when they brought a lamb and
confessed their sins on the head of that lamb, the priest sprinkled the blood in
the sanctuary, representing that their sins were transferred from themselves to
the sanctuary. That's why they had to have the Day of Atonement once a year, to
cleanse the sanctuary of all the sin that had accumulated through the year. This
has a direct application to the 2300-day prophecy of Daniel 8:14 which says,
"Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be
cleansed." We're not going to go into that part of it, but it relates
specifically to the day of atonement that is brought out in Leviticus 16.
Again, Daniel 8:24 says, "Seventy weeks (490 days or years) are
determined (cut off) upon (concerning) thy people and upon
(concerning) thy holy city to finish the transgression, and to make an end of
sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, . . ."
Reconciliation in simple language means to make friends out of
enemies. Isn't that what Jesus did for us through His death upon the cross? We
were alienated from God, but through faith in His shed blood we can become a son
or daughter of God.
It goes on to say, ". . .and to bring in everlasting righteousness, . .
."
This righteousness that was brought in was the perfect life that Jesus lived
right here on earth and made available to all people.
". . . and to seal up the vision and prophecy, . . ."
To seal up means "to close up or make an end" (Strong's #2856). In
other words, God is telling us here that the fulfillment of this prophecy is
going to happen-guaranteed! It will be brought to completion.
And the last phrase says, ". . . and to anoint the most Holy." Many
people today believe that the phrase Most Holy refers to Jesus Christ and to His
anointing. But I cannot come to that conclusion because nowhere in the Bible is
the term most holy applied to a person. In Hebrew most holy means "a
sacred place or thing" (Strong's #6944). Jesus was neither a place nor a thing.
Rather, the anointing here is talking about the heavenly sanctuary that had to
be anointed before Jesus our Great High Priest began His ministry in our behalf
in the holy and most holy places.
How do I come to that conclusion? From Exodus 40:9, "And thou shalt take
the anointing oil {anointing was always done with oil representing the Holy
Spirit, see Zechariah 4}, and anoint the tabernacle, and all that is therein,
and shalt hallow it, and all the vessels thereof: and it shall be holy."
This was to be done before the earthly high priest officiated in the
sanctuary that was built under the direction of Moses.
Within the framework of the 70-week prophecy the heavenly sanctuary was
anointed when Jesus ascended to heaven during His inauguration as our high
priest. The sanctuary had to be anointed by the Holy Spirit before Jesus began
His work as our High Priest just as it was in the Old Testament.
Daniel 9:25: "Know therefore and understand, that from the going forth of
the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem unto the Messiah the Prince
shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks: the street shall be built
again, and the wall, even in troublous times."
The date of the commandment or the decree that went forth to restore and to
build Jerusalem was 457 BC. It's important that we are able to show from God's
word that this is the date for the beginning of the 70 weeks, and also the
beginning of the longer 2300-day prophecy-the 70 weeks being cut off from the
beginning of that longer period. If we can't nail it down at the beginning, then
we can't prove anything else afterward.
Ezra 6 and 7 holds the key to the starting point of this prophecy. The
reference in Ezra 6:14 was after Solomon's temple was destroyed by
Nebuchadnezzar in 586 BC and Israel taken captive to Babylon. 70 years into
their captivity, verse 14 tells what would happen. "And the elders of the
Jews builded, and they prospered through the prophesying of Haggai the prophet
and Zechariah the son of Iddo. And they builded, and finished it, according to
the commandment of the God of Israel, and according to the commandment of Cyrus,
and Darius, and Artaxerxes king of Persia." According to this verse there
are four different individuals involved in the commandment to finish it-the
commandment of #1 the God of Israel, #2 of Cyrus, #3 of Darius, and #4 of
Artaxerxes king of Persia.
As we read verse 15 it seems to put a little glitch in this theory, but it
really doesn't if you understand it. "And this house was finished on the
third day of the month Adar, which was in the sixth year of the reign of Darius
the king." It has been understood for many years that it wasn't finished
until Artaxerxes made the last decree in 457 BC, but here in verse 15 it says
that this house was finished in the 6th year of the reign of Darius, long before
Artaxerxes came on the scene. What is the answer to this seeming dilemma? At
this point in the prophecy, Darius finished only his part! The temple wasn't
finished, according to verse 14, until Artaxerxes, the last in line, issued his
decree. Darius finished his part in 515 BC. But it was 58 years later, in 457
BC, when Artaxerxes made the final decree.
Ezra 7:7,8: "And there went up some of the children of Israel, and of the
priests, and the Levites, and the singers, and the porters, and the Nethinims,
unto Jerusalem, in the seventh year of Artaxerxes the king. And he came to
Jerusalem in the fifth month, which was in the seventh year of the king." As
we consult history we discover that the seventh year of Artaxerxes began in the
fall of 458 and ended in the fall of 457 BC, and it was in the fall of the end
of that year that Artaxerxes made his decree.
What was it that Artaxerxes accomplished with his decree? If you read the
rest of Ezra 7 you'll find that Artaxerxes made a decree that those who wanted
to go back to the temple and work on getting it all spiffed up were to be
allowed to do so, and they were to take all the gold and the silver that they
wanted to, to do whatever needed to be done to finish beautifying the temple.
And not only that, they were also allowed to take the vessels that
Nebuchadnezzar had taken out of Solomon's temple back to Jerusalem to use in the
service of God there.
Ezra 7:27 sums up what Artaxerxes' decree was all about. "Blessed be the
LORD God of our fathers, which hath put such a thing as this in the king's
heart, to beautify the house of the LORD which is in Jerusalem:"
The finishing touch of beautifying the temple, which was decreed in 457 BC,
is the beginning point of the 2300-day prophecy of Daniel 8:14, as well as the
70 weeks of Daniel 9:24. And not only that, the decree included something else.
In verse 25 it says, "And thou, Ezra, after the wisdom of thy God, that is in
thine hand, set magistrates and judges, which may judge all the people that are
beyond the river, all such as know the laws of thy God; and teach ye them that
know them not."
This was the decree that gave Jerusalem its legal rebirth. Israel was once
again an autonomous nation. And that is another specification to the fulfillment
"of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem."
Let's go back to Daniel 9 and we will continue to read and explain more of
these verses beginning again with verse 25: "Know therefore and understand,
that from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem
unto the Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks:
. . ."
We know that a score is 20. Threescore would be 60 and 2 more would be 62.
And so we have 7 weeks and 62 weeks for a total of 69 weeks. Here it is very
plain that from the time the commandment went forth to restore and build
Jerusalem until Messiah would come would be 69 weeks. The prophecy says that
after 69 weeks, or 483 years after 457 BC, which would be 27 AD, Messiah the
Prince would come. The word Messiah means "the anointed one." What
happened in 27 AD? Jesus was baptized in the Jordan River by John the Baptist
and the Holy Spirit descended in the form of a dove and they heard the voice of
the Father saying, "This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased."
As mentioned before, anointing was always done with oil and oil represents
the Holy Spirit. We see it all happening at the baptism of Jesus as the Holy
Spirit descended. Jesus was "anointed" to begin His ministry here on earth at
that very point in time.
Verse 26, ". . . and after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut
off, but not for himself: . . ." If you just skip over the rest of that
verse for now and go straight into verse 27 it flows very naturally when it
says, "And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the
midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, . .
."
Messiah the Prince-Jesus-was anointed at his baptism by the Holy Spirit in 27
AD. One week or seven years later would bring us to 34 AD, and the verse says
that the Messiah would be cut off in the midst of that one week, which would be
31 AD (three and a half years after His baptism).
Before we go on to explain further, let's go back and look at the part of
verse 26 we left out: ". . . and the people of the prince that shall come
shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a
flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined."
Who is this prince and who are the people of the prince? It's not referring
to Jesus anymore because He's not the one who came and destroyed the city and
the sanctuary. This is referring to Titus. Do you realize that Titus the Roman
was a prince? He was the son of the Roman Emperor whose name was Vespasian.
Titus was the prince and "the people of the prince" would be the Roman
soldiers who followed Titus and accomplished the work of destroying the city and
the sanctuary.
". . . and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the
war desolations are determined."
If you read the history of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD you would
have to agree that they came in like a flood. And right up until the end it was
war and desolation. The Jewish historian, Josephus, said that over a million
Jews perished in the siege of Jerusalem and the rest were taken captive.
Now let's go back to verse 27, "And he shall confirm the covenant with
many for one week: . . ."
What was the covenant that He would confirm for one week? It was the special
time when the gospel was to be preached to the Jews before going to the
Gentiles. That one week or seven years lasted from 27 AD to 34 AD.
Daniel said Messiah would "confirm the covenant with many for one week:
and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to
cease, . . ."
At the very moment when Jesus died on the cross of Calvary, the inner veil of
the temple was rent in twain from top to bottom (Matthew 27:51) signifying that
animal sacrifices were of no more value, because the true sacrifice, Jesus, had
been offered.
". . . he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for
(or because of) the overspreading of abominations he shall make it (the
city and the sanctuary) desolate, . . ."
The word desolate means "to devastate or to lay waste" (Strong's
#8074).
After Jesus died, did the Jews stop their animal sacrifices or did they
continue on? They continued on until the temple was destroyed. God used pagan
Rome to punish the Jewish people and to devastate the sanctuary and the city of
Jerusalem because they rejected the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross. All
sacrifices brought after that point were an abomination to God. That's why it's
referred to as an "overspreading of abomination." Because of that, He
made it desolate. It continues by saying, ". . . even until the
consummation (or the completion of its ruin), and that determined
(decided) shall be poured upon the desolate (or the desolator as it
says in your margin)." In other words, the agency God used to punish His people
by destroying Jerusalem and the temple would itself be devastated in the end,
and pagan Rome did finally come to an end only to be taken over by something
worse-papal Rome
|